Hi Andrea,
You are right - I tried unionfs by applying the patches to the 2.6.10
kernel.
The unionfs web site claims that the code is not 100% stable and my
experiments bear this out. I simply left the board running and over the
weekend it silently locked up (no console output). In my case the whole
root filesystem was a union - it may be better if you only union the
area you application resides in for example.
Regards
Phil Q
Andrea Gasparini wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at these unioned filesystems, in order to choice one for my
uses.
I'm interested in thoughts/comments/stories about them, but related with mv
2.6.10 kernel.
At a first glance, I'm giving more chances to aufs, but I've not already
tried them in 2.6.10 kernel.
I saw Phil gave a try to both [1], but I didn't see any other mail.
Well, comments?
Thanks.bye!
[1] http://linux.omap.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2008-
October/008622.html
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
