Hi David,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Brownell [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 3:40 PM
> To: [email protected]; Nori, Sekhar
> Cc: Stijn Devriendt; Narnakaje, Snehaprabha
> Subject: Re: TSIF/VLYNQ/... drivers
> 
> On Friday 16 January 2009, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> > Currently we are following the plan outlined by Sneha here:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/davinci-linux-open-
> [email protected]/msg07408.html
> 
> Which on 24-Sept-2008 promised:
> 
> > > I will share updates and status of this plan to the list
> > > on a monthly basis.
> 
> I don't think I've seen such an update from TI...

Sorry for the delay. Next week, we will put together a page on the wiki for the 
status. I guess, it will be based on what you have outlined below.

Thanks
Sneha

> 
> One comment:  it'd be good to see "merge to mainline" on
> that list of tasks.
> 
> 
> My own summary, specific to DM355 EVM support in the
> public GIT tree (now compatible with 2.6.28):
> 
> COMPONENT     STATUS         COMMENT
>  boot         working
>  uart         working        at least, ttyS0 as console
>  i2c          working
>  msp430       working        including leds, buttons, remote, rtc
>  gpio         working
>  edma         working        ... but needs more cleanup ...
>  mmc/sd       working        (the robust rootfs solution)
>  sdio         coded          patch sent as RFT [1], no feedback
>  audio        dropouts       Troy has some patches in the works
>  dm9000       not robust     works fine on my EVM; not at all on others
>  usb          not robust     e.g. can't enumerate usb flash
>  nand         avoid          no 4-bit ecc support; nonstandard OOB layout
>  spi          nyet
>  video input  nyet           tvp codec driver in the works
>  video output ?
>  mjcp         nyet
>  suspend      nyet           no davinci PM at all yet
> 
> The stuff marked "working" in that list is in the same
> shape on the DM6446 EVM, except the msp430 (which is
> different, the dm355 firmware is less troublesome too).
> 
> Also, the 644x/646x EMAC driver looks to me as if it's
> nearly ready to submit to mainline.  Fixing the ioremap
> stuff should be easy; a merge in 2.6.30 looks doable.
> Mergeable EMAC is IMO a big change ... but just one! ;)
> 
> - Dave
> 
> [1] http://linux.omap.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2009-
> January/010243.html

_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to