Hello.
Steve Chen wrote:
- We (or at least *I*) had no desire to have the same kernel binary
run on both a da8xx and a davinci. So, cutting out the davinci
runtime code & data that was wasting memory was "A Good Thing (tm)".
Kevin seems the only person interested in ahving the same kernel
binary, not clear why though...
ersonally, I would love to see single binary that is capable of running
on all DaVinci + OMAPLx/DA8xx EVMs. It really does make testing
integration much easier. I also believe that it is worth the extra
efforts.
Well, the community's rule is "you want it, you do it". :-)
However, I also find that not able to have a usable uImage for
DA8xx very difficult to swallow.
Yes, thanks for bringing this issue up -- we all have been forgetting
about RAM being mapped differently on OMAP-L1x from DaVincis too.
Actually, that is the only real sticking point for me.
Only for you. ;-)
I'll investigate how to get around this problem when time permits.
Regards,
Steve
WBR, Sergei
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
