On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 15:12 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > > > - We (or at least *I*) had no desire to have the same kernel binary > > run on both a da8xx and a davinci. So, cutting out the davinci > > runtime code & data that was wasting memory was "A Good Thing (tm)". > > > > Kevin seems the only person interested in ahving the same kernel > binary, not clear why though... > Personally, I would love to see single binary that is capable of running on all DaVinci + OMAPLx/DA8xx EVMs. It really does make testing integration much easier. I also believe that it is worth the extra efforts. However, I also find that not able to have a usable uImage for DA8xx very difficult to swallow. Actually, that is the only real sticking point for me. I'll investigate how to get around this problem when time permits.
Regards, Steve > > _______________________________________________ > Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list > [email protected] > http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
