Hello.
Kevin Hilman wrote:
From: Sergei Shtylyov [mailto:[email protected]]
[ ... ]
So, how should we reference to OMAP-L1x in kernel (in order to avoid the
confusion with real OMAP)?
It's the strong preference from my group, Performance Media, that
"da830" be *included* in the name.
Lester, thanks for sharing the views of your group.
[...]
Maybe one could consider that a side benefit of such naming is
easier distinction versus "real OMAP" (or maybe "original OMAP").
Yes, I think that using the d830 naming only would avoid this
confusion.
That's all good but what about the coming RMS320DA828? Won't we have to
rename everything very soon?
Kevin
WBR, Sergei
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
