Sergei Shtylyov <[email protected]> writes: > Hello. > > Russell King wrote: > >>>Therefore, my proposal is to leave it in arch/arm/mach-davinci/ until >>>there is need to reuse it elsewhere. > >> Sounds good to me. Just give it a sane config symbol, and then moving >> it elsewhere in the tree shouldn't be too problematical. > > OK, will CONFIG_TI_CP_INTC do a a sane symbol? >
Looks good to me. I think as long as it doesn't mention davinci it's easy to transplant. Kevin _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
