Hello. Kevin Hilman wrote:
Russell King wrote:
Therefore, my proposal is to leave it in arch/arm/mach-davinci/ until there is need to reuse it elsewhere.
Sounds good to me. Just give it a sane config symbol, and then moving it elsewhere in the tree shouldn't be too problematical.
OK, will CONFIG_TI_CP_INTC do a a sane symbol?
Looks good to me. I think as long as it doesn't mention davinci it's easy to transplant.
I decided to drop TI_ as in the context of arch/arm/mach-davinci/ it sounded superfluous (and it wasn't necessary even in the context of arch/arm/common/).
Kevin
WBR, Sergei _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
