Why? Please, someone say to me, why have I two source kernels in one cd to dm646x: one kernel has support to dm646x and the other *not*?
More than it: why the damn quickstart told me to use the *wrong* path!??? This version didn't support dm646x! And of course, it doesn´t have the davinci_dm646x_defconfig file!! Paths and Names > The following paths and names are used for this LSP: > LSP name: ti-davinci_evm > LSP installation path: * > /opt/montavista/pro/devkit/lsp/ti-davinci_evm-arm_v5t_le* > Toolchain installation path:/opt/montavista/pro/devkit/arm/v5t_le/bin > Default kernel image name: uImage-ti-davinci_evm > Default kernel image path: > /opt/montavista/pro/devkit/arm/v5t_le/target/boot > Default RAM disk image: > /opt/montavista/pro/devkit/arm/v5t_le/images/ramdisk.gz > Boards tested: TI-Davinci_EVM Gamma > Rebuild kernel command (NFS or RAM disk): make uImage > Location of rebuilt kernel: arch/arm/boot/uImage > The correct path is the other: */opt/montavista/pro/devkit/lsp/ti-davinci .* I discovered it after this discussion and after had made a search in my whole file system for "davinci_dm646x_defconfig". All the other documents and how-tos just said to "go to lsp directory" or "going to the kernel path" and because the quickstart, I always tried to use ti-davinci_evm-arm_v5t_le . Gosh! Seen that someone just copy/paste the instructions and files to dm6446 into this CDs without take a look or test the process =/ And, more than it, this other source, why is it here in a support's CD to dm646x? Someone from Texas, please, correct it in the next installation CD. I lost one day because mistakes in the documentation and misinformation. Thanks for all the help here. On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Steve Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 10:30 -0300, Marcelo Guedes Silva wrote: > > > > > > I just done it. Same problem. One point that I forgot to mention is > > that I´m using dm6467, not dm6446 and don´t exist a > > davinci_dm646x_defconfig, only davinci_dm644x_defconfig. Did you > > sometime compile it to dm6467? > > > > I´m using the files from the DVSDK CDs (SPRC592A and SPRC597C). Now I > > ´m suspecting that it´s old and doesn´t support dm646x EVM (I guess > > now that they put only a compiled version in the right way, but the > > source files are old). > > I saw that a linux version exists in > > http://wiki.davincidsp.com/index.php?title=Linux_Toolchain with a lot > > of patches to dm6467. I will try to use it. I´m downloading it now. > > Yeap, sound like you found the problem. If you don't see > arch/arm/configs/davinci_dm6467_defconfig, then the kernel does not have > dm6467 support. Also, there is a newer release at > > > https://www-a.ti.com/downloads/sds_support/targetcontent/psp/mv_lsp_2_00/index.html > > May want to consider using it. > > Regards, > > Steve > > > >
_______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
