[ TI internal-only lists dropped ] <[email protected]> writes:
> Add platform related changes for vpfe capture driver on DM355 > > Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri <[email protected]> [...] > static struct platform_device *davinci_evm_devices[] __initdata = { > &dm355evm_dm9000, > &davinci_nand_device, > @@ -190,6 +273,8 @@ static struct davinci_uart_config uart_config __initdata > = { > static void __init dm355_evm_map_io(void) > { > davinci_map_common_io(); > + /* setup input configuration for VPFE input devices */ > + setup_vpfe_input_config(&vpfe_capture_inputs); This is the same function name as in dm644x, so this naming cannot work when support for both platforms is built into the same kernel. Might I recommend building with 'davinci_all_defconfig' so that these naming problems get exposed at compile time. I suggest you use the names dm355_setup_video(...) and dm644x_setup_video(...) Kevin [...] _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
