On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 08:54:01PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Saturday 28 March 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
> > +u32 davinci_timer_irqs[NUM_TIMERS] = {
>
> Isn't wanting NUM_TIMERS itself a problem? Why not just
> pass the size of the timer address array, and then just
> know that the IRQ array is twice as big?
Okay, that makes sense.
Mark
--
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source