On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 02:18:02PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > "Mark A. Greer" <[email protected]> writes: > > > Round 2. > > > > I believe I have addressed all of the issues that I agreed to address. > > Every patch has checkpatch.pl's cleanly, builds cleanly, and has been > > tested on a dm355 evm, dm6446 evm, and dm6467 evm. The last patch was > > also tested on a da830 evm. > > > > This series assumes that the following patches have been added: > > > > http://linux.omap.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2009-March/012097.htmlhttp://linux.omap.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2009-April/012389.html > > > > Using the commit below[1] as the starting point and applying the two > patches you reference above, this series doesn't fully apply. > > git am fails to apply patch 11, but forcing it makes it apply with > fuzz, suggesting we have a slightly different base. Next, patch 13 > fails to apply even after forcing due to conflicts in the at24 setup. > I tried with and without the at24 patch you reference above and it fails > in both cases. > > What's the base commit id of the tree you're using, before the two > commits you link to above? > > Kevin > > [1] commit 8a16ff458a27764d72647c4a0b57f5ec82135f88 > Author: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]> > Date: Thu Mar 5 11:18:20 2009 -0800 > > davinci: eeprom: use new memory accessor interface > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>
Hmm... They are based on 8a16ff458a27764d72647c4a0b57f5ec82135f88. I must have resolved some conflicts in the other patches locally & forgot. I'll forward them to you in a minute. Mark -- _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
