"Mark A. Greer" <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 02:18:02PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> "Mark A. Greer" <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > Round 2. >> > >> > I believe I have addressed all of the issues that I agreed to address. >> > Every patch has checkpatch.pl's cleanly, builds cleanly, and has been >> > tested on a dm355 evm, dm6446 evm, and dm6467 evm. The last patch was >> > also tested on a da830 evm. >> > >> > This series assumes that the following patches have been added: >> > >> > http://linux.omap.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2009-March/012097.htmlhttp://linux.omap.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2009-April/012389.html >> > >> >> Using the commit below[1] as the starting point and applying the two >> patches you reference above, this series doesn't fully apply. >> >> git am fails to apply patch 11, but forcing it makes it apply with >> fuzz, suggesting we have a slightly different base. Next, patch 13 >> fails to apply even after forcing due to conflicts in the at24 setup. >> I tried with and without the at24 patch you reference above and it fails >> in both cases. >> >> What's the base commit id of the tree you're using, before the two >> commits you link to above? >> >> Kevin >> >> [1] commit 8a16ff458a27764d72647c4a0b57f5ec82135f88 >> Author: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]> >> Date: Thu Mar 5 11:18:20 2009 -0800 >> >> davinci: eeprom: use new memory accessor interface >> >> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]> > > Hmm... They are based on 8a16ff458a27764d72647c4a0b57f5ec82135f88.
OK, that's the same base I was using. > I must have resolved some conflicts in the other patches locally & forgot. > I'll forward them to you in a minute. No change with the new versions of the writethrough and the at24 fixup patches just posted. Still fails on patch 11 and 13. Kevin _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
