"Subbrathnam, Swaminathan" <[email protected]> writes: > Sergei, > > I am pretty fine with both DA8xx and DMxxx devices being located in > mach-davinci directory. Let us not fault Kevin for it and as I see it, it > was and is a community enabled decision. Both architectures share some > essential similarities. > > The point I am trying to make here is that functionalities such as OHCI and > PHY definitions dependant on CFGCHIP register and their hookups etc. are > unique to DA8xx family from USB perspective. > > Whereas DMxxxx family of devices share a common definition sets for PHY and > do not share any similarity with DA8xx in the way they are connected to the > subsystem and they do not have OHCI interface. > > Given this I definitely feel the need to 2 separate header files. > > Either way if the general consensus is to have a single usb.h for the whole > of DaVinci platform I am fine with that too. > > I will wait for Kevin's and community's input. >
Please keep a common <mach/usb.h> Kevin _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
