Hi Kevin, [...] > This is something that's been on my TODO for some time and I've been > ignoring it. Thanks a ton for tackling it.
Unless this has been covered elsewhere, what does the davinci TODO list look like? Pet peeves with the code? >> These changes were tested only on the tnetv107x evm platform. > > I tried a boot test on dm355 and da8xx and neither booted, but didn't > do any more digging, because I want to take off for the weekend on a > happy note. :) Ouch. > Next step is to track the boot problems on dm* and da* and then get > this merged. If we take care of it next week, I'd like to queue this > up for 2.6.35. Excellent. I'm desperate to get my claws on a nice internal test setup with dmx, da8xx and tnetv107x boards. That would substantially simplify our lives. > Thanks again Cyril, and nice work! Glad to contribute. Eventually, I'd like to see IO_ADDRESS() disappear altogether. Is there a plan to phase this out? Cheers -- Cyril. _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
