Hello.

Sekhar Nori wrote:
In the edma driver some if statememnts are broken up such that
the condition code is at the same indentation level as the
statement block. This makes reading it particularly difficult.

This patch fixes that issue.

Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dma.c |   26 +++++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dma.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dma.c
index cc5fcda..2734de9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dma.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dma.c
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dma_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
        dev_dbg(data, "dma_irq_handler\n");
if ((edma_shadow0_read_array(ctlr, SH_IPR, 0) == 0)
-           && (edma_shadow0_read_array(ctlr, SH_IPR, 1) == 0))

  IMHO this level of indentation doesn't affect the readability.

+                       && (edma_shadow0_read_array(ctlr, SH_IPR, 1) == 0))
                return IRQ_NONE;
while (1) {
@@ -406,9 +406,9 @@ static irqreturn_t dma_ccerr_handler(int irq, void *data)
        dev_dbg(data, "dma_ccerr_handler\n");
if ((edma_read_array(ctlr, EDMA_EMR, 0) == 0) &&
-           (edma_read_array(ctlr, EDMA_EMR, 1) == 0) &&
-           (edma_read(ctlr, EDMA_QEMR) == 0) &&
-           (edma_read(ctlr, EDMA_CCERR) == 0))

  What's up with these too?

+                       (edma_read_array(ctlr, EDMA_EMR, 1) == 0) &&
+                       (edma_read(ctlr, EDMA_QEMR) == 0) &&
+                       (edma_read(ctlr, EDMA_CCERR) == 0))

Your increased indentation looks rather ugly to me... matter of taste, of course.

@@ -469,9 +469,9 @@ static irqreturn_t dma_ccerr_handler(int irq, void *data)
                        }
                }
                if ((edma_read_array(ctlr, EDMA_EMR, 0) == 0)
-                   && (edma_read_array(ctlr, EDMA_EMR, 1) == 0)
-                   && (edma_read(ctlr, EDMA_QEMR) == 0)
-                   && (edma_read(ctlr, EDMA_CCERR) == 0))

Again, I don't find anything bad about this, except I'd put && at the end of lines, no at the start...

+                               && (edma_read_array(ctlr, EDMA_EMR, 1) == 0)
+                               && (edma_read(ctlr, EDMA_QEMR) == 0)
+                               && (edma_read(ctlr, EDMA_CCERR) == 0))

WBR, Sergei

_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to