Caglar Akyuz wrote: > On Thursday 17 June 2010 11:43:27 am Christophe Aeschlimann wrote: >> I was surprised to see that the PINMUX registers configuration (in >> da850.c) is SOC dependant (part of common initialisation). I think >> the PINMUX configuration is definitely a board specific setting. > > Actually it is not SoC specific. Possible pinmux configurations are > defined in SoC specific files, then they are adjusted in board > specific files using 'davinci_cfg_reg' which is defined in mach/mux.h.
There is at least one instance I have run into: dm355.c:dm355_ccdc_setup_pinmux() hardcodes several VPFE pins as video inputs, 3 of which aren't used on our board. Not sure how this should ideally be fixed, not a big deal for us, maybe an array of muxes passed as platform data for ccdc? -- Jon Povey [email protected] Racelogic is a limited company registered in England. Registered number 2743719 . Registered Office Unit 10, Swan Business Centre, Osier Way, Buckingham, Bucks, MK18 1TB . The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended by Racelogic Ltd for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is directed and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email so that the sender's address records can be corrected. The views expressed by the sender of this communication do not necessarily represent those of Racelogic Ltd. Please note that Racelogic reserves the right to monitor e-mail communications passing through its network _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
