Hi Jean-Christophe,
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 06:32:57, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux <[email protected]>
>
> We have two SoCs using SRAM, both with their own allocation systems,
> and both with their own ways of copying functions into the SRAM.
>
> Let's unify this before we have additional SoCs re-implementing this
> obviously common functionality themselves.
>
> For this use the generic allocator and the newly introduce
> gen_pool_add_virt and gen_pool_virt_to_phys
>
> Uio_pruss should probably take the SRAM pool pointer via
> platform data so that it doesn't have to include Davinci specific
> includes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sekhar Nori <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
I tested this on DA850 using suspend-to-RAM and audio, it works
well!
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 +
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/common.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/sram.h | 13 +----
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/pm.c | 21 +++----
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/sram.c | 57 +++++--------------
> arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iram.h | 28 ++++++++--
> .../plat-mxc/{include/mach/iram.h => iram_alloc.c} | 40 ++++++++------
I had trouble applying the plat-mxc stuff on v3.0-rc1.
Can you please check?
I also found some check patch errors. Feel free to merge
the attached patch.
With these, please add my:
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <[email protected]>
Thanks,
Sekhar
----8<-------
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iram.h
b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iram.h
index 8279c47..aae5e35 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iram.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iram.h
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static inline void *iram_alloc(size_t size, phys_addr_t *phys)
*phys = gen_pool_virt_to_phys(iram_pool, addr);
- return (void*)addr;
+ return (void *) addr;
}
static inline void iram_free(void *addr, size_t size)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/sram.h
b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/sram.h
index 52b9b5c..cc99397 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/sram.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/sram.h
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ extern struct gen_pool *omap_gen_pool;
size_t _sz = size; \
void *_sram = gen_pool_alloc(omap_gen_pool, _sz); \
_res = (_sram ? fncpy(_sram, &(funcp), _sz) : NULL); \
- if (!_res) \
+ if (!_res) \
pr_err("Not enough space in SRAM\n"); \
_res; \
})
diff --git a/drivers/uio/uio_pruss.c b/drivers/uio/uio_pruss.c
index db486cc..444176e 100644
--- a/drivers/uio/uio_pruss.c
+++ b/drivers/uio/uio_pruss.c
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static int __devinit pruss_probe(struct platform_device
*dev)
goto out_free;
}
- gdev->sram_vaddr = (void*)gen_pool_alloc(davinci_gen_pool,
sram_pool_sz);
+ gdev->sram_vaddr = (void *)gen_pool_alloc(davinci_gen_pool,
sram_pool_sz);
if (!gdev->sram_vaddr) {
dev_err(&dev->dev, "Could not allocate SRAM pool\n");
goto out_free;
diff --git a/sound/soc/davinci/davinci-pcm.c b/sound/soc/davinci/davinci-pcm.c
index dd305a2..1c383ab 100644
--- a/sound/soc/davinci/davinci-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/davinci/davinci-pcm.c
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static int allocate_sram(struct snd_pcm_substream
*substream, unsigned size,
return 0;
ppcm->period_bytes_max = size;
- iram_virt = (void*)gen_pool_alloc(davinci_gen_pool, size);
+ iram_virt = (void *)gen_pool_alloc(davinci_gen_pool, size);
if (!iram_virt)
goto exit1;
iram_phys = gen_pool_virt_to_phys(davinci_gen_pool,
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
