Hi Jean-Christophe,

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 06:32:57, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux <[email protected]>
> 
> We have two SoCs using SRAM, both with their own allocation systems,
> and both with their own ways of copying functions into the SRAM.
> 
> Let's unify this before we have additional SoCs re-implementing this
> obviously common functionality themselves.
> 
> For this use the generic allocator and the newly introduce
> gen_pool_add_virt and gen_pool_virt_to_phys
> 
> Uio_pruss should probably take the SRAM pool pointer via
> platform data so that it doesn't have to include Davinci specific
> includes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sekhar Nori <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>

Is this patch slated to be merged for v3.1?
I did not find it in linux-next.

There is some further cleanup done by Ben
Gardiner for DaVinci which depends on this patch.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index f4b7dfa..5ec5e5f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -848,6 +848,7 @@ config ARCH_DAVINCI
>       bool "TI DaVinci"
>       select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
>       select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> +     select GENERIC_ALLOCATOR
>       select ZONE_DMA
>       select HAVE_IDE
>       select CLKDEV_LOOKUP

Just noticed that GENERIC_ALLOCATOR is already selected
For DaVinci (it is right below the CLKDEV_LOOKUP selection)
so this part of the patch can be dropped.

Thanks,
Sekhar

_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to