[email protected] wrote:
> Thanks for the quick answer, my application needs to handle a
> periodic routine every 16ms, with a latency of no more than
> 200us I've tried with the Linux timers and it work great when
> I had only that process running but when I added other
> processes depending on the CPU load the latency could
> sometimes be higher than the one accepted.

That does sound like quite tight timing. Have you looked at
SCHED_FIFO and priority?

Maybe you can get away without PREEMPT_RT..

--
Jon Povey
[email protected]

Racelogic is a limited company registered in England. Registered number 2743719 
.
Registered Office Unit 10, Swan Business Centre, Osier Way, Buckingham, Bucks, 
MK18 1TB .

The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended by 
Racelogic Ltd for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is 
directed and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If you 
have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from 
your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the 
error by reply email so that the sender's address records can be corrected. The 
views expressed by the sender of this communication do not necessarily 
represent those of Racelogic Ltd. Please note that Racelogic reserves the right 
to monitor e-mail communications passing through its network


_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to