Hi, On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Alexander Holler <hol...@ahsoftware.de> wrote: > Am 19.09.2013 19:48, schrieb Olof Johansson: >> Hi Sekhar, >> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:22 AM, Sekhar Nori <nsek...@ti.com> wrote: >>> The following changes since commit 272b98c6455f00884f0350f775c5342358ebb73f: > ... > >>> 3) A patch to complete the DT support for EDMA. Without >>> this patch, the DT support for EDMA cannot be used. >>> There are no in-tree DT users of EDMA currently but >>> nevertheless the patch fixes a previously incomplete >>> implementation. >> >> Finishing incomplete work is not a fix, especially if the users aren't >> in-tree. The other patches are just fine to include though. > > It fixes problems for all people which are not using the provided DT's > but using edma in their own DT. So I don't understand your arguing as DT > got introduced to not only support in-tree configs. It clearly fixes > problems.
Right, that was the smaller part of the argument. The bigger is: Completing a feature is not a fix. If the whole feature didn't make it in for a release, then the rest goes into the next release. -Olof _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
