Am 20.09.2013 19:40, schrieb Olof Johansson:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Alexander Holler <hol...@ahsoftware.de> wrote:
Am 19.09.2013 19:48, schrieb Olof Johansson:
Hi Sekhar,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:22 AM, Sekhar Nori <nsek...@ti.com> wrote:
The following changes since commit 272b98c6455f00884f0350f775c5342358ebb73f:
...
3) A patch to complete the DT support for EDMA. Without
this patch, the DT support for EDMA cannot be used.
There are no in-tree DT users of EDMA currently but
nevertheless the patch fixes a previously incomplete
implementation.
Finishing incomplete work is not a fix, especially if the users aren't
in-tree. The other patches are just fine to include though.
It fixes problems for all people which are not using the provided DT's
but using edma in their own DT. So I don't understand your arguing as DT
got introduced to not only support in-tree configs. It clearly fixes
problems.
Right, that was the smaller part of the argument. The bigger is:
Completing a feature is not a fix. If the whole feature didn't make it
in for a release, then the rest goes into the next release.
Bureaucrazy at it's best.
Regards,
Alexander Holler
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
