Lu Heng via db-wg wrote on 13/06/2018 13:11:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 20:10 Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote:
This has been discussed extensively and there has been consensus to go
ahead with this.
That’s a bullying answer.
What Gert said was simply a statement of fact:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2017-October/005711.html
You are welcome to disagree with the decision of the chairs, but that
decision was made several months ago.
An consensus define as an acceptable resolution to all parties, and we
being one of the party find the solution unacceptable with sounding
argument, therefore no consensus.
RIPE working groups tend to follow the rfc7282 definition, and have
never considered unanimity to be grounds for consensus.
Nick
