Hi, On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 08:11:34PM +0800, Lu Heng wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 20:10 Gert Doering <g...@space.net> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 08:03:20PM +0800, Lu Heng via db-wg wrote: > > > And until then, I think there is not enough consensus from the community > > to > > > implement this change in the future. > > > > This has been discussed extensively and there has been consensus to go > > ahead with this. > > That???s a bullying answer.
It's the way our community works.
We discuss a problem, propose a solution, get agreement on problem and
solution, get an implementation plan, agree to this, and *then implement it*.
We do *not* go through all the process and stop right at the end because
someone decides to disagree *months after the time for discussion was
ended*.
> An consensus define as an acceptable resolution to all parties, and we
> being one of the party find the solution unacceptable with sounding
> argument, therefore no consensus.
Please read RFC7282 - while we're not the IETF, this is comparably to
the way the RIPE working groups operate wrt consensus and "someone is
always complaining".
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
