Good point -- actually there is no need to have any person objects in
the database, except for:
- the owner of internet resource is in fact a natural person;
- voluntarily offering personal data, e.g. if admins willingly want to
share their details by referencing person objects from a role object.

Agoston
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 3:52 PM denis walker via db-wg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander
>
> GDPR is the necessary 'force'. If there is personal data in the database that 
> cannot be justified according to the defined purpose of the database and 
> governing policies then it should be removed.
>
> cheers
> denis
> co-chair DB-WG
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Alexander Stranzky via db-wg <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2018, 15:45
> Subject: [db-wg] PERSON objects in the RIPE Database
>
> Am 20.09.18 um 15:40 schrieb denis walker:
> > Hi Alexander
> >
> > You may well be right but duplicated personal data in a public database
> > for 'convenience' is probably not acceptable.
>
> Hi Dennis,
>
> I totally agree with you. But unfortunately it's difficult to force ISPs
> to clean up their data.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alexander Stranzky
> --
> velia.net Internetdienste GmbH * Hessen-Homburg-Platz 1 * 63452 Hanau
> Geschäftsführer: Franz G. Köhler, Arek Akilli * AG Hanau * HRB 7588
> Tel: +49  6181 1898119 * http://www.velia.net
>
>
>

Reply via email to