Hello,
My point was with the maintainer pair creation as I don't see a reason
to give up personal information in the first place.
Kind Regards,
Cynthia Revström
On 2018-09-21 18:38, Daniel Suchy via db-wg wrote:
Hello,
On 9/21/18 5:00 PM, Cynthia Revström via db-wg wrote:
This really made me consider it, and I can't really see a valid reason
to require person objects to create a maintainer for example.
You can use ROLE object instead of PERSON for maintaner creation (and of
course for every object, where you can reference person object). Person
is *not* required.
Well, currently is not possible to create role-maintainer pair like
person-maintainer with webuptates, but this isn't hard to implement I
think. But you can easily workaround this by creating person-maintainer
pair, then creating role, update maintainer and deleting (temporary)
person object.
With regards,
Daniel
