George, Ed, everybody,
This seems as good a moment as any to wave the POLA, transparency,
and due-process banners.
On 1 Jul 2021, at 23:46, George Michaelson via db-wg wrote:
I don't think this problem has a single simple fix. You can do a
post-hoc sweep of the records periodically, with some process, and
probably solve the classic 80/20 of this situation.
I wonder what criterion (or set of criteria) is available as the
basis for such a sweep.
As Edward Shryane via db-wg wrote on 1 Jul 2021, at 17:18:
We dropped the authentication requirement for the origin as part of
NWI-5,
which went into production on 4th September 2018.
As I read this (from Ed), data such as are involved in “this
situation”
are currently acceptable for insertion into the database, according to
criteria concretized in the implementation of NWI-5.
It seems to follow that anyone who has placed such data in the database
may reasonably expect that they remain there, without interference, not
only for as long as these acceptance criteria remain in effect, but also
beyond that until action to remove or rectify prior data has been agreed
by consensus in the WG, passed as a new NWI to the NCC, and implemented
with due notice to the interested parties.
Process and following it are tedious.
Premature action is surprising, lacks transparency, and is unfair.
I suggest keeping to the “yellow brick road”.
Best regards,
Niall
—
However far away I may place my hat, some of you will be convinced you
can see its shadow.
