Hi Janos. > Generally speaking it is a good idea to avoid using the comment character (#) in the > attribute fields (descr in this case), unless you use it for a comment indeed. > > In your example I have the impression that # is intended to stand for "number".
it is indeed a "number" prefix but I am of course aware that in general everything behind a # comment sign could potentially get lost.
@Ed: If this were a comment (it is not here but what was I thinking to use the # for anything else :-D) wouldn't this still be something someone could want to update? Let's say a peer's name in an aut-num object or similar? I would have expected that also comments should get the chance to be updated.
Not a big issue of course but still wondering why it was implemented that way. Thank you and best regards Sascha -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
