Hi, On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 01:47:23PM +0200, Edward Shryane via db-wg wrote: > The comparison logic ignores comments as it's not considered part of an > attribute's value, i.e. it's not significant (it's only for humans to read as > metadata).
I find that approach flawed. If I send you an update that differs in
parts humans will find interesting to read, and that you are going to
*store*, ignoring it as part of the "has anything changed" check will
do no good, and create friction at times.
Ignoring bits that are *not stored* (like, whitespace normalizations,
or possible uppercase/lowercase stuff on attribute names, etc.) makes
sense to me. Emphasis on "not stored".
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
