Hello Wessel, Many thanks for your feedback. I agree there are drawbacks to using a combined status value. If there is consensus on using a tuple (similar to what we already do for route(6)) then the DB team will implement this.
I also plan to mention NWI-4 during the DB-WG session tomorrow, any feedback is appreciated. Regards Ed Shryane RIPE NCC > On 24 May 2023, at 08:52, Wessel Sandkuijl via db-wg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I've reviewed Ed's impact analysis for NWI-4 and his proposal to add a new > status value "ALLOCATED-ASSIGNED PA". This will not cover all use cases and > it's use will most likely be limited as most people are used to the > "ALLOCATED PA" versus "ASSIGNED PA" status values. > > I would highly prefer the earlier alternative proposal to use a tuple (using > both prefix and status) so no new status value is introduced to the RIPE > database. > > Can this be moved forward? > > Regards, > > Wessel Sandkuijl > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
