Colleagues On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 08:52, Wessel Sandkuijl via db-wg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I've reviewed Ed's impact analysis for NWI-4 and his proposal to add a new > status value "ALLOCATED-ASSIGNED PA". This will not cover all use cases and > it's use will most likely be limited as most people are used to the > "ALLOCATED PA" versus "ASSIGNED PA" status values. > > I would highly prefer the earlier alternative proposal to use a tuple (using > both prefix and status) so no new status value is introduced to the RIPE > database.
As Wessel pointed out this was one of the earlier proposals and it did have some support at the time. It is technically more challenging and has implications on queries and query data output. How do you feel about such a change? cheers denis co-chair DB-WG > > Can this be moved forward? > > Regards, > > Wessel Sandkuijl > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
