Hi Nick On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 at 16:41, Nick Hilliard via db-wg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > the job of a chair is to ensure that the business of the forum is done, > in an orderly and efficient way.
Where is this stated? > From this point of view, an "active" > chair is good, and to be welcomed. What isn't ok is when a chair > decides to take a specific point of view and actively engages on an > issue, on one side or another. Where is it stated that a chair can't take a specific point of view during a discussion? Maybe a chair takes a point of view in order to elicit further details from those involved in a discussion on that point. > > This isn't a "one or two vocal members" thing either. There is > extensive and long standing good practice documented in relation to what > duties and responsibilities a chair has, Please point me to this extensive documentation? > and unanimously, this good > practice mandates neutrality on the part of the chair. Again, point me to the documentation that states that all co-chairs must be neutral in any discussion? There are a couple of documents on chairs responsibilities: https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-692 https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-765 https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-764 Please tell me which part of any of these docs I am not complying with. cheers denis co-chair DB-WG > > Nick > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
