On Wed, 3 Jul 2024, denis walker via db-wg wrote: (...)
The high cost and low (if any) benefit of splitting this data is completely pointless. Or maybe it will be split on object types. But given that few people are likely to be querying the history of some of the object types, like maybe set objects and poems, does it still make any sense? Do we really have a problem making such a small range of data items available to anyone who is interested in this operational data? If there is a concern that some personal data still slips through, maybe in descr:, then perhaps it needs another legal review, not a redesign. My recommendation is that we drop NWI-17. cheers denis
(...) I agree with Denis and i support dropping NWI-17. Regards, Carlos -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
