On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 08:57:01PM +0100, Martin J. Evans wrote: > > [1]rosenfield.alb...@gmail.com wrote: > > >> In practice this results in circa 70% of smoke testers running the > >> module with DBI installed. > >> The remaining 30% however, fails with this error: > > > Where do you get the 70%/30% ratio from? > > state, version, count(*) > 'fail', '1.609', 44 > 'na', '1.609', 16 > 'na', '1.611', 1 > 'pass', '1.609', 1153 > 'pass', '1.611', 101 > 'unknown', '1.609', 11 > 'unknown', '1.611', 1 > > 4% (rounded up) of failures for fails/passes in 1.609 discounting nas. > > The na status are all perls too old (not at least 5.8.1). > > Of the fails in 1.609 most are test failures (after compilation) and for > problems Tim has addressed in > 1.611. > > Of all the failures in 1.609 (44 of them) I got fed up of checking them > after doing over half of them > and finding no lack of compiler problems.
> [...] but I don't as yet see any evidence that 30% of build failures are > down to lack of a > compiler. Thanks for looking into it Martin. Tim.
