I agree on getting of RT to Github. Basically, it's 2017 and github is
good at what it does.
On 11/14/2017 11:40 AM, Dan Book wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Michiel Beijen
<michiel.bei...@gmail.com <mailto:michiel.bei...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:07 AM, <p...@cpan.org
<mailto:p...@cpan.org>> wrote:
> Hi! As there are only few tickets on github, it would be easier to
> disable creating new tickets on github and those few which are not
> resolved yet either move on RT or (if github allows it; which I
believe
> yet) continue to exists.
>
> And once any migration is ready, then it can be fully switched.
>
> Still one bugtracker is better then two, even if it is not on
github.
Yeah, I'm sure this is *easier*. But I really hate the RT cpan bug
tracker, so I'd prefer to look again at migrating from RT >> Github -
if that really would not work for some reason I'll consider migrating
the other way around.
I also prefer github but of course it's mainly up to what is easiest
for the maintainers. Here is a script for migrating tickets if it's
not what you already tried: https://metacpan.org/pod/RTx::ToGitHub
-Dan