On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 11:06:58AM -0600, Sterin, Ilya wrote: > In the docs shouldn't this be changed... > > *** > If `PrintError' is also on, then the > `PrintError' is done before the `RaiseError' > *** > > to > > *** > > If `PrintError' is also on, then the > `PrintError' is done before the `RaiseError' > though 'RaiseError' will override 'PrintError' > and the error will be printed as die() rather than > warn(). > *** > > Or something like that... Err, why, exactly? Tim.
- RE: executing atomic transactions in DBI Sterin, Ilya
- RE: executing atomic transactions in DBI Neil Lunn
- RE: executing atomic transactions in DBI Bodo Eing
- RE: executing atomic transactions in DBI Neil Lunn
- RE: executing atomic transactions in DBI Sterin, Ilya
- Re: executing atomic transactions in DBI Tim Bunce
- RE: executing atomic transactions in DBI Sterin, Ilya
- Re: executing atomic transactions in DBI Tim Bunce
- RE: executing atomic transactions in DBI Sterin, Ilya
- RE: executing atomic transactions in DBI Sterin, Ilya
- RE: executing atomic transactions in DBI Tim Bunce
- RE: executing atomic transactions in DBI Sterin, Ilya
- Re: executing atomic transactions in DBI Tim Bunce
- RE: executing atomic transactions in DBI Neil Lunn
- Re: executing atomic transactions in DBI Tim Bunce
- RE: executing atomic transactions in DBI Sterin, Ilya
- RE: executing atomic transactions in DBI Neil Lunn