Re: fetchrow_hashref still slower than fetchrow_arrayref?

[Tim Bunce]

On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 05:14:33PM -0400, Matthew O. Persico wrote:
> Tim Bunce wrote:
> > p.s. It'll be done via a new $h->{FetchHashReuse}=1 and it's non-trivial
> > because the way I intend to do it will make fetchrow_hashref effectively
> > become an alias for fetchrow_arrayref and thus be _just as fast_.
> 
> Will $h->{FetchHashReuse}=1 be the default?

No.

> If so, then lots of code will break.

I know.

Tim.