Michael Peppler wrote: > Wilson, Doug writes: > > > > > From: CHEN SEI-LIM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > DBI should be independent from OS's specific. > > > Especially without PID will cause some forms of synchronization error. > > > If <subject of FUD deleted> does have this problem. It means IT IS NOT A > > GOOD > > > DATABASE. > > > > Tell me, then, what are some 'GOOD' databases?? > > (ROTFLMAO...) > > Actually, Sybase :-) > > And it's not the database itself, of course, but rather the way the > client library and the protocol is implemented that matters in this > case... > > Michael > -- > Michael Peppler - Data Migrations Inc. - http://www.mbay.net/~mpeppler > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > International Sybase User Group - http://www.isug.com Yes, you got it. The only problem is HOW THE DBD IMPLEMENTED. But it may not happen. If you want your database can be accessed by UNIX and NT both. 1. How will you design your protocol? 2. How will you implement your DBI? I suppose Oracle or Sybase do support $dbh sharing, even I have never used them. Unless the database pushes some extra data to DBD. But it may not happen.
