-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 10:50:32PM -0500, GB Clark wrote: > Am I mistaken, or is the license on the oracle module for DBI invalid? > > The GPL states plainly that you may not add other restrictions, and the Artistic also > says you can to do this (distribute it on a commericial media) very plainly.
If you're saying that the above makes it invalid, then you are incorrect. These licenses are talking to the end users of the code, not the original author. The author is the sole holder of copyright; hence, he is free to append his own stipulations for redistribution. After all, if you don't comply with his wishes, you can't (legally) redistribute his code under *any* license. - -- Stephen Clouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Senior Programmer, IQ Coordinator Project Lead The IQ Group, Inc. <http://www.theiqgroup.com/> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjzM2BEACgkQA4aoazQ9p2eaUwCfbtr1RQUL0H/qDN4utzFQeYqs yj8An3D8Bdy+fOA0HeV6NQOvJeLvb3Dm =mPft -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
