On Thu, 2 May 2002 10:35:32 -0500, Phil Oertel wrote: >> > I was assuming empty strings were converted to SQL nulls as undefs are. >> Not by DBI but maybe by your underlying DBMS? > >Access 97. I believe it makes the distinction.
Access has a bit of a habit of making fields of type "cannot be empty
but it can be null". I would not be surprised if, in such a case, it
would automatically turn an empty string into NULL.
--
Bart.
