On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 03:13:49AM -0500, Stephen Clouse wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:25:15AM +0200, NYIMI Jose (BMB) wrote:
> > Dear,
> > 
> > A friend recommended me this white paper:
> > 
> > http://www.ambysoft.com/persistenceLayer.html
> > 
> > The Author suggests to implement what he called "Robust Persistence Layer"
> > between "Business Classes" and "Storage mecanism" (ex Relational Database").
> > 
> > Here an extrait from the white paper:
> > 
> > "This approach to persistence effectively allows your database administrators
> > (DBAs) to do what they do best, administer databases, without forcing them to
> > worry about what their changes will do to existing applications. As long as
> > they keep the data dictionary up-to-date they can make whatever changes they
> > need to make to the persistence mechanism schema. Similarly, application
> > programmers can refactor their objects without having to worry about updating
> > the persistence mechanism schema because they can map the new versions of
> > their classes to the existing schema. Naturally when new classes or attributes
> > are added or removed to/from an application there will be a need for similar
> > changes within the persistence mechanism schema."
> > 
> > 
> > Is there in Perl's world a way to avoid hard coding SQL in DBI.
> > I would like to have your opinion about this white paper.
> 
> It's entirely correct in an OO context; however, you're confusing what the paper
> describes with DBI :)
> 
> DBI is simply the low-level database driver that handles the interface to the
> database server.  To fit it into the parlance of the aforementioned paper, DBI 
> is the PersistenceMechanism object.
> 
> Obviously you have to write SQL at some point, because there's no other way to
> talk to the database, and you need something like DBI to do the talking.  The
> point the paper gets at is to expose a data-centric object model to the
> application, and let the object worry about building and executing the proper
> SQL.
> 
> Class::DBI is a good example of a Perl module that implements (most of) the rest
> of that diagram, and probably a good place to start looking.

Plus http://search-beta.cpan.org/author/SAMV/Class-Tangram/
 and http://search-beta.cpan.org/author/DROLSKY/Alzabo/
 and http://search-beta.cpan.org/author/AGUL/Persistence-Database-SQL/
 and http://search-beta.cpan.org/author/DWINTERS/Persistent-Base/
 and http://search-beta.cpan.org/author/DWINTERS/Persistent-DBI/

"There's more than one way to do it! :)

Tim.

Reply via email to