I would rather it be SQL::AbstractSyntaxTree because then someone would not have to "know" what AST meant to figure out if that is what needs to be used.
- [RFC] SQL::AST (SQL Abstract Syntax Tree) - DBI r... Darren Duncan
- Re: [VPM] [RFC] SQL::AST (SQL Abstract Synta... Malcolm Dew-Jones
- Re: [Poop-group] [RFC] SQL::AST (SQL Abstrac... Bob X
- Re: [Poop-group] [RFC] SQL::AST (SQL Abstrac... Tim Bunce
- Re: [RFC] SQL::AST (SQL Abstract Syntax ... Darren Duncan
- Re: [RFC] SQL::AST (SQL Abstract Syntax Tree... Matthew Simon Cavalletto
- Re: [RFC] SQL::AST (SQL Abstract Syntax Tree... Darren Duncan
- RE: [RFC] SQL::AST (SQL Abstract Syntax Tree... Avis, Ed
