Dean Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Which brings me back to the notion of non-blocking requests. Assuming
> >>many/most client libs do support an async capability, and a OOB
> >>cancel, then it should be possible to standardize the behavior
> >>externally.
> >
> >Attempting to standardize, let alone implement, non-blocking requests
> >for the current DBI is a far bigger task than the above.
> >
> >On the other hand, I'd be *delighted* if you, or anyone else, would like
> >to champion the work.
<cheap hack>
Start up a thread to handle the request, which sets a state variable on
the statement handle then the request has been processed?
</cheap hack>
- Tyler
