On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 05:24:53PM -0700, Joel Noble wrote: > Thanks -- will give that a try. > > Can I assume this means you believe that DBD::Oracle/DBI should > indeed be pre-caching rows in the reading from the cursor that was > received from the procedure? That is, it is reasonable to think that > it should be doing pre-caching and that it's a bug (configuration > problem, etc.) that it's not working? This is my assumption, but I'm > not sure -- perhaps I'm expecting something that doesn't really work that > way.
This topic has cropped up from time to time. I believe the code does the right thing and that the issue _may_ be related to specific Oracle versions. But then again I don't recall anyone specifically saying it worked for them. Check the archives for more detail. Tim.
