On 5/10/07, Brandon Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/10/07, Christopher H. Laco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Given that I understood about 1% of that... :-)
> Would using 'calculateMRO' in a CAG::C3->get_super_paths($class) for now
> still be more correct at this point?
>
Yes, so long as you detect that $class is using C3 and only do it in
those cases. mro::get_linear_isa($class) will do the same basic thing
as calculateMRO, but it automatically knows about C3 vs "normal", and
gives the right answer for both. (once it exists for your perl).
I guess I'm failing to mention that everything I'm saying is
predicated on the idea of making CAG C3-compatible, rather than adding
a new package CAG::C3
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
