On 5/10/07, Christopher H. Laco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brandon Black wrote:
> On 5/10/07, Brandon Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 5/10/07, Christopher H. Laco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Given that I understood about 1% of that... :-)
>> > Would using 'calculateMRO' in a CAG::C3->get_super_paths($class) for
>> now
>> > still be more correct at this point?
>> >
>>
>> Yes, so long as you detect that $class is using C3 and only do it in
>> those cases.  mro::get_linear_isa($class) will do the same basic thing
>> as calculateMRO, but it automatically knows about C3 vs "normal", and
>> gives the right answer for both.  (once it exists for your perl).
>>
>
> I guess I'm failing to mention that everything I'm saying is
> predicated on the idea of making CAG C3-compatible, rather than adding
> a new package CAG::C3
>
>

And I'm assuming to make a CAG::C3.. and use that inside of DBIC rather
than just using CAG....

So, when is mro::get_linear_isa($class) available...

Real Soon Now :)  I'm in a time crunch at $work right now, but it's
not a hard module to write.  Perhaps this weekend.

And do I need to know if a $class is or isn't C3ed, if we're talking
about all accessors inside of the DBIC core code...

You don't, you can assume, I think.  I think it would be even better
to wait for mro.pm and do it as a patch to the existing CAG though.
CAG::C3 looking at Class::C3 stuff won't work for people doing C3
without Class::C3 on perl 5.9.5+, whereas the mro.pm approach will,
since it's a backport of those 5.9.5+ interfaces.

-- Brandon

_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to