On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:20:16PM +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> Matt S Trout wrote:
> >Anything left or do we start cutting 08100 dev releases?
> >
> >(the "single accessor doesn't return undef" test patch doesn't count
> >unless somebody produces one that doesn't break the rest of the test suite,
> >it's a silly bug but I'm not delaying for it)
> >
>
> There was some crazyness that leaked from SQLT, don't know if it can be
> considred serious enough (makes deploy of moderately complex schemas
> unusable on mysql, possibly others):
> http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/dbix-class/2008-April/006056.html
Is that our problem or SQLT's?
If ours, is anybody interested in writing a failing test and/or a patch for
this?
The key thing here is to have any feature patches in, since they're what
needs to be release cycled (if you'll excuse my gratuitious verbing). Bug
fixes that people aren't already working on can always wait for 08101.
--
Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
Technical Director http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Want a managed development or deployment platform?
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/ http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/servers/
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
