Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:20:16PM +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
Anything left or do we start cutting 08100 dev releases?
(the "single accessor doesn't return undef" test patch doesn't count
unless somebody produces one that doesn't break the rest of the test suite,
it's a silly bug but I'm not delaying for it)
There was some crazyness that leaked from SQLT, don't know if it can be
considred serious enough (makes deploy of moderately complex schemas
unusable on mysql, possibly others):
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/dbix-class/2008-April/006056.html
Is that our problem or SQLT's?
I'd think DBIC since the affected file is part of the DBIC distribution.
If ours, is anybody interested in writing a failing test and/or a patch for
this?
There is nothing to write really, just a reversal of the patch introducing the
regression (mentioned in the email thread). Nobody ever claimed the commit, so
I am not sure what the procedure is. If you release the way it is now deploy()
will be seriously borked on mysql at the very least. I can write tests for
this if you think it will be beneficial (so it doesn't leak in again).
OTOH I have to admit that I am not entirely sure what was the purpose of the
initial changes. Seems very counterintuitive.
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
