On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:25:33AM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 03:03:47PM -0300, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > I propose then this gets documented on some future revision, because
> > discard_changes does not sound like something that would refresh new
> > values.
>
> Don't "propose this gets documented".
>
> Send a doc patch.
I already sent Ash a small patch for the FAQ, based on what had
been discussed here, but I don't know if he did like it or not.
Having a second proposal probably won't hurt!
Regards, Jens
--
\ Jens Thoms Toerring ________ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\_______________________________ http://toerring.de
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
