Hi, I hadn't gotten an ACK that this change would be committed, next time I'll suggest a patch.
Regards, Jose On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Ash Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 29 May 2008, at 11:47, Jens Thoms Toerring wrote: > > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:25:33AM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote: >> >>> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 03:03:47PM -0300, Jose Fonseca wrote: >>> >>>> I propose then this gets documented on some future revision, because >>>> discard_changes does not sound like something that would refresh new >>>> values. >>>> >>> >>> Don't "propose this gets documented". >>> >>> Send a doc patch. >>> >> >> I already sent Ash a small patch for the FAQ, based on what had >> been discussed here, but I don't know if he did like it or not. >> Having a second proposal probably won't hurt! >> >> >> > I applied the doc patch the other day - thanks. > > -ash > > > _______________________________________________ > List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class > IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class > SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ > Searchable Archive: > http://www.grokbase.com/group/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- http://zefonseca.com/
_______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
