BUCHMULLER Norbert wrote: > I just suspect that > my thread was ignored by accident. >
Indeed it was. The functionality patch looks good in itself. However I am not sure that the tests changes are appropriate. The test name is 88result_set_column which implies calling methods on a resultset. Yet you changed a number of $rs->accessor invocations to $rs->first->accessor. Please explain why you did this. _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
